Nate, you'd know more about the legal ramifications than me, but what does the murder conviction for Connor bode for the abortion crowd? I can't understand how you can hand out prison terms for ending the life of a fetus, but still maintain that a woman should have a right to end that life herself.
I'm certainly no expert on anything, but I'll offer my thoughts.
You're right in that there seems to be a philosophical inconsistency in allowing abortion but declaring the intentional killing of another's fetus murder.
Unfortunately, abortion is, according to Roe, a constitutional right. As long as Roe is the law of the land, no state murder statute defining a fetus as a human being for purposes of a murder charge (as I'm sure CA must have), or any other state or federal staute, can have any affect on the legality of abortion. (A partial-birth abortion ban may be different, but even it may be considered unconstitutional under Casey, if I remember my con law correctly.)
Bottom line: the murder conviction for Connor's death does highlight the philosophical inconsistency with abortion, but that's it.
3 Comments:
Nate, you'd know more about the legal ramifications than me, but what does the murder conviction for Connor bode for the abortion crowd? I can't understand how you can hand out prison terms for ending the life of a fetus, but still maintain that a woman should have a right to end that life herself.
Enlighten me, O Wise One.
I'm certainly no expert on anything, but I'll offer my thoughts.
You're right in that there seems to be a philosophical inconsistency in allowing abortion but declaring the intentional killing of another's fetus murder.
Unfortunately, abortion is, according to Roe, a constitutional right. As long as Roe is the law of the land, no state murder statute defining a fetus as a human being for purposes of a murder charge (as I'm sure CA must have), or any other state or federal staute, can have any affect on the legality of abortion. (A partial-birth abortion ban may be different, but even it may be considered unconstitutional under Casey, if I remember my con law correctly.)
Bottom line: the murder conviction for Connor's death does highlight the philosophical inconsistency with abortion, but that's it.
PS. Make that "effect," not "affect," in the post above. Sorry, I'm anal about that kind of stuff.
Post a Comment
<< Home